It seems you're using an old browser. In order to view this site correctly, we advise you to upgrade your browser, or try the free Mozilla Firefox.

Print Email

Labor > News Hits

Sore at Channel 4


Published 7/28/1999

More Media Stories

Behind the blinders (10/6/2010)
Finding the 10 most underreported stories of the last year

Metro Retro (10/6/2010)
Looking back on 30 years of MT coverage

Letters to the Editor (10/6/2010)
Our readers sound off, and MT reaps awards

More from Ann Mullen

Reading, writing and politics (10/13/2004)
Proposition E is a test of Mayor Kilpatrick’s clout

Fistful of fun (9/29/2004)

Uplift the senses (9/22/2004)
Detroit Chamber offers glorious escape

About 60 union employees and supporters picketed WDIV’s downtown offices last Friday with signs that read "Turn off Channel 4, it’s bad news for workers."

According to Dan Morgan, a video editor in the news department and spokesman for the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians (NABET) Local 43, the station is trying to reduce union jobs. He says the company wants photographers, (who are in another union) and non-union workers to be field editors, a position currently covered by NABET members. That would continue to gut the union, which has lost almost half its members in the last 15 years, he says.

"We only have 47 full-time employees" in the union, he says. "We had 85 full time in 1985."

The company also wants to expand the use of temporary employees, who are not entitled to benefits and union wages, said Morgan.

WDIV general manager Alan Frank says that the station has no intention of using temporary employees in place of union workers. He says that the only issue on the table is allowing photographers to be field editors. This means allowing photographers, who are not in NABET but another union, to do the work of editors. He says this would turn around news pieces quicker and make the station more competitive. Frank also says that the boycott has had no effect on the station’s ratings or revenues. "Instead of negotiating they want to have a boycott and we think it is remarkably shortsighted because it will backfire on them," says Frank.

blog comments powered by Disqus